Theoretical examples
| Example 1 Suppose we want to examine the association between gender (x) and income (y). Gender has the values 0=Man and 1=Woman. Income is measured in thousands of Swedish crowns per month and ranges between 20 and 40. Let us assume that we get a B coefficient that is -1.3. That means that women have (on average) 1300 SEK less in monthly income compared to men. |
| Example 2 Suppose we want to examine the association between having young children (x) and the number of furry pets (y). Having young children is measured as either 0=No young children and 1=Young children. The number of furry pets is measured as the number of cats, dogs, or other furry animals living in the household, and ranges between 0 and 10. We get a B coefficient that is 0.98. In other words, those who have young children have (on average) almost one additional furry pet compared to those without young children. |
Practical example
| Dataset |
| StataData1.dta |
| Variable name | gpa |
| Variable label | Grade point average (Age 15, Year 1985) |
| Value labels | N/A |
| Variable name | bullied |
| Variable label | Exposure to bullying (Age 15, Year 1985) |
| Value labels | 0=No 1=Yes |
sum gpa bullied if pop_linear==1 |

The variable bullied is a binary variable with two categories: 0=No, 1=Yes. When we add it to the model, the category with the lowest value will be the reference category (i.e. No).
reg gpa bullied if pop_linear==1 |

R-squared is 0.01. Thus, bullied only explains 1% of the variance in gpa.
The B coefficient for bullied is -0.23. In other words, those who have been exposed to bullying have, on average, a 0.23 point lower grade point average compared to those who have not been exposed to bullying. This is not a very high estimate.
Nonetheless, there is a statistically significant association between bullied and gpa, as reflected by the p-value (0.000) and the 95% confidence interval (-0.27 to -0.18).
| Summary At age 15, there is a negative (B=-0.23) and statistically significant (95% CI=-0.27 to -0.18) association between exposure to bullying and grade point average. Put differently, individuals who were exposed to bullying received a lower grade point average compared to those who were not exposed. |